When webpages weren't much more than text and images peppered with
hyperlinks, and when animated elements were limited to slideshow-like
animations by Compuserve GIF, Macromedia Flash (now Adobe Flash)
transformed the web, making it visually engaging. Even PCs with
first-generation Pentium processors and 56K internet connections had
access to a much superior internet experience thanks to Flash. According
to Adobe's own statistics, over 90% of internet-enabled PCs have the
Flash Player browser plugin installed. Apparently the "open/free
everything" proponents want the world to get rid of the Flash plugin.
Why? Because it's not "open", not all platforms can use it, and it poses
security hazards.
Brandishing an extremely original name, "Occupy Flash"
calls itself to be a "movement to rid the world of Flash Player
plugin," because "Its time has passed. It's buggy. It crashes a lot. It
requires constant security updates. It doesn't work on most mobile
devices. It's a fossil, left over from the era of closed standards and
unilateral corporate control of web technology." Occupy Flash argues
that with HTML5, Flash is redundant and "free". Not quite; people don't
pay for Flash Player plugins, those who create Flash content do, for the
Adobe Flash software. It's not like a transition to HTML5 is going to
change that equation much. People still won't have to pay to be able to
consume public HTML5 content, while those creating it will still need to
use proprietary software to create quality content, it's just that
they'll end up with more vendors to sell them that.
Recently, Adobe announced that it will discontinue Adobe Flash for
mobile devices. Could that be a valid bone of contention of Occupy Flash
crowd? It's both yes and no. Very few websites use Flash to run their
functional parts (for example, GeForce.com before its HTML "makeover"),
besides, trends show an increasing number of websites being
mobile-friendly, some sites like ours, have separate pages for PC and
mobile platforms. Fora such as the Mobile Web Congress are steering that
change, proactively. HTML5 isn't a monolithic "knight in shining
armour" that isn't buggy or never needs security patches. Switch to
YouTube's HTML5 mode,
use it for a week, and tell us your experiences. It's one thing to
promote open standards proactively, it's quite another to reactively
fight an established standard just because it isn't "open" enough. BRB -
occupying a snack bar for some grub.
No comments:
Post a Comment